**CAUTION: FANGIRL ANGST AHEAD!!** I was distracted all day Tuesday, thinking about those pictures of Richard Armitage at last night’s charity event, the Golden Heart Awards, in New York City. Guylty (with some sourcing from Kate) posted the pictures yesterday and I’ve posted them again below — plus an additional picture from the event.
While spending way too much time on-line today, I found Richard again in the background of this picture from the charity’s website (no photographer credit was given):
And here it is focused in (apologies to the photographer for enlarging and cropping the very clear photo):
The first record of the event was from Richard on Twitter giving us a nice photo of just himself at the dinner, showing the hair, mustache, and beard that he’s growing, maybe for Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya play, scheduled to begin January in London. Very nice look, I think. (As opposed to the random guy next to him in this photo, who really should have ironed his suit jacket.)
But then the official photos of the evening by Patrick McMullan showed up on Getty Images (thanks, Kate via Guylty, for the find).
So, first, I really like his whole look, including the suit, shirt, and tie. I love that he’s put on a bit of weight and looks healthy and like he’s just enjoying life. Nice that he’s taking a pause between jobs right now, it seems.
Over on Guylty’s blog, Rachel pointed out that the man he is with is Jim Gibb, listed in some places as Creative Director at Authentic Brands Group. Others show him as formerly being in that position, but having been an art director in advertising and design for more than 15 years, with a BA in graphic design from Brigham Young University. (The man in the middle in the last photo is Sheridan (Dan) Wright, who is on the charity’s board.)
But, wow. Is this a date? Out in public? And being photographed? And if so, was he holding back from being photographed with a male romantic interest only while his mum was still alive?
Or, did the charity invite him and this is a pal who lives in his building or works out at the same gym or whatever? Or is there somehow a professional reason that he might know him? Is Gibb involved in brand management for celebrities, for example?
I was talking to my friend at work today and we were discussing how she and I often pose close together in photos, but there is only friendship between us, so a pose doesn’t necessarily mean anything. On the other hand, my other friend at work says that I am in denial.
So, the next question is: If Richard was on a date, does it change the way I feel? Is it important to my fangirling experience that I can maintain plausible deniability? That there is no overt declaration?
Why should it matter? It’s not as if I would ever be in a position where my movie boyfriend would ever become my real boyfriend (not to mention even that of course I’ve been married for 31 years). And yet, is it important to my idea of him that he potentially be romantically interested in women?
These are only questions, but they have kept me thinking all day.
I don’t really like to engage in the “is he – is he not”. I have my own theory, but as long as he hasn’t clarified it himself, I’m keeping the discussion behind the scenes. However, I do agree that the answer to the “is he – is he not” has an impact on fangirling. And yet this is such a tricky topic. I have never touched upon in on my own blog because I simply don’t know how to write about it without being misunderstood. (And a lot of that fear has actually been shaped by experiences with earlier such speculations/facts when those fans who were not on board the ship, were branded homophobic.) But since you mentioned it – let’s be honest here: Maybe it’s just me, but crushing on an actor (for me) is also affected by the (entirely theoretical) availability of the crush as a romantic interest. I’m a heterosexual woman – hence I’d like to crush on a heterosexual man. That’s simply what *my* logic tells me – however irrational or irrelevant it actually may be with regards to that particular actor. Hence my fangirling will definitely be affected when the crush is generally unavailable due to his sexual orientation. – However, the speculation/fact that is gleaned from these images, is not new to me. I have had time to consider the fact that he is not “crushable” (for me) anymore. My work-around has been to move the crushing away from the actor – and to the characters he plays.
The point is – whether he is gay or straight in RL doesn’t matter to me anymore. Whomever he loves in his private life, he is *still* entirely convincing when he plays straight character on screen. I’ve never felt that he was unconvincing as Esther Krug’s love interest, or that he looked “not-heterosexual” when portraying Reba McClane’s lover. He plays it well and is a joy to watch.
LikeLiked by 3 people
That is a really great work-around, G, to focus on the characters. I’m really grappling with this whole thing myself right now. Like, really. Granted, I’m going through some pretty stressful crap right now, but I’m kind of surprised at how hard this has hit me. Of course I just want our beautiful, adorkable man to be happy IRL. He, like every good human, deserves it. But yeah, if the .00000000001% chance that he could be obtainable by me is completely taken away? I’m going to have to reconsider my crushing. I still will adore him as a human being and always admire his work but…I dunno. Just feeling a little crushed myself right now. I can’t even express it well and am angry with myself for letting it all be so important to me.
Anyway…excellent post, Sue! Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. My own personal take on how his willingness to be so open in these photos relates to the death of his mum is that he’s realized that life is too short not to acknowledge that you have someone who holds your heart in his. 💖
LikeLiked by 3 people
I can’t believe how much this distracted me yesterday. I don’t usually write posts about this aspect of my fangirling experience, but it seemed like something I needed to do. Not really sure what the photos mean, and still not sure whether it will affect my feelings.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sue if it is any consolation to you I was sooo distracted yesterday by it and comments alluding to it that I dreamt about the event and getting really upset with him that he went without telling me!! I know !! I love your point how this affects YOU as a fan girl because that is what I was thinking as well. So kudos to you for writing such a thoughtful and thought provoking post!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lol on the dream. Yes the question for me is how it would affect me as a fangirl. I’m just not sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sue me either which is why when you wrote this post I felt comforted by it like it’s not just me thinking these things or having so much preoccupation with it. You are so honest and genuine in your posts and THAT is comforting as well to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I go back and forth thinking “is he — is he not”. I haven’t yet decided if, or how much, the question affects my fangirling experience. It’s not about homophobia, of course. It’s about whether it affects my crush, my feelings. I like your workaround. Makes a lot of sense. He definitely looks convincing on screen in romantic encounters, for the most part.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I was thinking about why this doesn’t really work for me last night (“crushing on the characters”) and while I definitely have fantasies about some of the characters (lately, in particular, Thorin Oakenshield), it doesn’t really work for me as a modus of fangirling. I don’t have crushes on them, I think in part because I identify with many of them so strongly. N&S got me not because I fell in love with Mr Thornton, but because I saw myself in him. On a deep level, too, I am probably more interested in how he creates or sees the characters than I am in the characters themselves as objects of infatuation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂 ” I am probably more interested in how he creates or sees the characters” me too. By the way, he said he prefers to play the parts of characters far from his own personality (except J Standring perhaps).
LikeLiked by 3 people
That’s interesting. I do have crushes on some of the characters, but probably only because of how they were created by RA. While I could see myself still rewatching my favourites, I’m not sure if I would still follow his career/life so closely if the crush on the man himself faded away. So while it strikes me as a good idea, I’m not sure that just crushing on the characters would fully do it for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think eventually one hits a limit on rewatches, too, unless (e.g.) you’re very involve in the fanfic community and you develop a whole headcanon to go with it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sue, well thank you for addressing this openly on your blog. You must have ESP because I too thought about this yesterday and last night.
I don’t know. My assumption is he has now moved to London. I thought maybe he was put at the table and photographed at random esp with the Dan guy in the middle pic. But yeah I wrestle with the same thing I mean I am happy for him period I joke a lot about my dreams of him and I, but if Rachel and I do get to meet him at the SD I know I’ll be a bloody emotional mess: omg you’re Richard Armitage!!
I got upset yesterday at that possibility that he is or maybe bi because it would destroy my sexual fantasies but if he is happy it won’t change that he’s a great guy humble and honest and hopefully happy!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m sure a lot of us were thinking about this yesterday. I wonder if he is 100% in London, though. He probably still owns his New York pad. And I’m sure he has a group of friends (not necessarily lovers) from living there. I would definitely be overcome with emotion if I were to meet him too, regardless. There is just something about him…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sue yeah I sort of figured he had moved full time back to London with the Stranger taking up 5-6 months of his time, the play now and his dad and brother/family there and friends there that is his TRUE home. But again don’t know.
And yeah I have a whole scenario played out in my head. We are going 2 nights to see the play and hopefully do SD both nights. One scenario all is cool and we get group pic and signatures and the other scenario I am a blubbering idiot and need Rachel and hopefully our other fandom group to hold me up.
I just felt comforted maybe that you and I were clicking on the right cylinder re those pics and Kelly’s comment today about not jumping to conclusions about the pics has really calmed me down. It shouldn’t be a big deal. I’m happy he looks healthy and fit. We don’t have all the details but yeah I was down yesterday.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seeing the play and the Armitage should be fun, even if you need to be held up so you don’t fall down. 😁
Well, I think we have to remind ourselves that we really have no idea at all what is really going on in his life and be content with that. I try, anyway.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sue, yes and I agree with you that we have no idea which is probably better in the long run. I will say the discussion here today has been extremely stimulating and it is nice to have an opinion and chat about it as adults.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely for me, part of my crush on Richard came from falling in love with a character from a book and I definitely transfered my affections to him because, unlike the book character, he’s real and still alive! Lol
I love John Thornton and John Porter and John Standring. Richard is handsome and sweet and i adore him-he’s a proper soft guy and that totally floats my boat.
So what I’m getting at is yes, I would be a bit sad if he’s gay but I would be sad if he was married! Would it stop me crushing? Hard to say because he is nether of those things at present to my knowledge. However, like most fangirls ultimately I would like for him to be happy, he sparkles when he’s happy and thats all that I would wish for that lovely man.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Rachel, I think that what you said is really nicely put. I love Daniel Miller my first love and how I came into all of this fandom last year and John Standring and of course Proctor and Raymond (I’m probably in the minority on him) but yeah I think the illusions of Richard the man being available and straight definitely float my boat too and if he were married or he came out (not like LP was forced out in March) if that were the case I would be crushed physically but it wouldn’t change how I feel for him as a man who I think is down to earth, sometimes a bit naïve, a tad ignorant but has a soft heart. What I didn’t like was the overt speculation (not by you lovely) about these pics when there is no official status.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t think there is anything necessarily wrong with speculation, but we don’t really know. It could be a date or a couple of friends or a work relationship or who knows what.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sue yes quite true. Just seemed many were automatically making them a “couple” based on pics and it just rubbed me the wrong way. Maybe denial on my part (as your co worker said) or maybe that type of speculation IMO is not good. But absolutely we don’t know and it could totally be who knows what.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, I don’t think we have enough info to draw a firm conclusion. It’s not like they were kissing or anything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
right!! no firm conclusion at all. Again if he is happy then great and maybe he was happy to be amongst people and socializing too. He looked healthy and fit and that was really nice to see. I told Rachel he could have used Ilaria’s help though on the outfit!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked the outfit! I would much rather see a normal business suit look than a fashion Ilaria look, personally. But to each her own.
LikeLike
Agree emphatically. No harm in speculating and in fact that’s a normal part of fandom as people try to figure out what they need from the fan experience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I stand right by you with Raymond (and Daniel, Proctor …)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahh Jane 😘❤️❤️👏👏I’ll share all three with you happily!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Richard always said that people love his characters, not him, but there is also something about the man himself. But I do love Thornton and Sir Guy. I’m sure Richard is not much like either of them!
I do like the idea that he is potentially “available”, but you never know what is going to affect your crush really until it happens. And as you say, I like it when he looks happy and healthy and comfortable in his own skin.
LikeLiked by 2 people
To me, that’s deflection on his part — I never believed he honestly thought that was true. I do totally believe that it bemuses and perhaps sometimes bothers him that people are infatuated with him (among other reactions he may have).
LikeLiked by 1 person
: ) Otherwise, since a long time ago, he would have been invested more in his relationship with the fandom (cf Mads Mikkelsen)
LikeLiked by 2 people
yes — and I think he more or less abandons the characters when he’s done, which may be another reason not to get super engaged with fans — in essence what they are asking about is ancient history for him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would forgive fans, who may have preferences for a few caracters. But what about reporters?
Reporters wishing to cover events involving a highly regarded actor need to be aware of some simple rules for approaching him and talking about recent works, rather than old off date ones…I shall not long write about a pseudo “reporter” who went overboard in squeezing out sympathy from the fans readers or viewers, presenting herself as a fan but asking questions without much journalistic interests.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree. And even if he may like it sometimes, he would deflect because he’s not supposed to like it, according to what we are taught growing up about humility.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point Sue and I think he’s quite humble which I really love about him !
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
in terms of stage door — I only ever saw him react with bemusement (although others had other experiences), albeit with cooperation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can honestly say on a principled level that I don’t care either way and that after all these years, it has no impact on my fantasies about the actor, but I didn’t get that far when I saw this photo because YUCK PETE BUTTIGIEG. Politics are a much more serious turn on / off for me, I think because of where I live — in a state that “swung” for Trump last time by about 29,000 votes. It’s not so much that I think Buttigieg has a snowball’s chance in hell of being the Democratic nominee as that I really have issues with facile politics. In the end the whole “Armitage leads with the feelings” and its pitfalls is a much serious of axis of attraction for me than photos with any guy. (That said, I don’t think these photos are great evidence of anything in that regard. I won’t get into it because I got heartily sick of that discussion over the years.)
LikeLiked by 3 people
It’s not that I haven’t thought about it before, but I’ve never come to a conclusion as to whether it does/will affect my fangirling experience. I don’t know much about Pete Buttigieg and didn’t actually know he was hoping to become the Democratic nominee. Armitage does lead with the feelings, though, for sure. I always cringe just a bit when he gives us a bit of a homily, even when he’s quoting someone.
LikeLike
I was forced to think about it a lot in 2013-4 (or maybe it would be more accurate to say — when I started broaching the topic of thinking about it, the response was so vehemently negative that I was forced to think about it in ways I hadn’t planned to, and then finally decided to keep what I ended up thinking under wraps). I appreciated the honesty of this post and since you’ve now kind of inspired me twice maybe it’s time for me to publish the “manifesto” I formulated recently and get on with my blogging life.
I just think anyone who would would say that people in the US (no matter their political situation) “hate half the country” are spending too much time listening to the media and not enough time in actual communities *doing* politics.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Do you mean the response was negative in that people didn’t think one should speculate, or didn’t think he was gay, or were upset that he might be gay, or??
Thanks. I’m thinking that by jumping in again, blogging regularly will feel natural again. In terms of honesty, it’s funny… I had an easier time talking about this than about the other thing I was thinking about… that I really like the way the fit of the trousers he is wearing totally accentuate his right thigh! (blushes)
Yes, you may be right on that in terms of politics.
LikeLike
all three of those plus “insisted he must be gay” (and that those of us who said the evidence wasn’t clear either way were homophobic).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah I see. I’m kind of glad I wasn’t here for that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At the time it was really awful (others can verify this) but in retrospect of course it’s interesting to think about in the context of what our societies are experiencing these days with changing attitudes toward sexual orientation. I think what was most troubling, though, was the way that we saw a discussion emerge in which it was clear that people (in many different positions) were not only wedded to whichever fantasy they had about him, but were insistent (in destructive ways) that their fantasy also be real. To me, the most important level of analysis for this topic involves understanding that *whether or not a fantasy corresponds with reality*, all of what fans think is fantasy and that’s the attraction of it. When people start insisting that because their fantasy may overlap in some way with reality, their fantasy itself must be real, conversations get dangerous.
LikeLike
That tends to prove that they might have lost touch with reality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it’s hard to say because a lot of people who shipped very intensely were pretty “normal” people outside their shipping life. In any case they certainly didn’t totally lose touch with reality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
(“to tend to”) I was not sure but thought it could be , that was what I wanted to write, SORRY!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well said Servetus! I shall add if you agree , that the fans can read your excellent articles: “Heterosexual utopias” ,”The ship that dare not speak its name” .
As for me, from the beginning, only his prowess as an actor led me to follow his career. No crush fantasies on my part. Definitly, I am vaccinated against this type of disease. That’s why I have always been wondering about the definition of a fan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think beyond “a devoted or interested follower of a person, thing, place, etc.” there are really too many boundaries to the definition of fan. (That said, a lot of people would say I am not a fan of Armitage’s because they would insist that the definition include unreservedly positive feelings and statements.) I personally definitely had and still have a crush, but i think he has had plenty of fans over the years who didn’t / don’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactement.
Il y a quelques années, j’avais envoyé sur votre blog un court paragraphe qui comparait mon vécu à celui d’une personne qui passait du premier coup foudre,…, à la routine du compagnonnage, où l’on accepte les différences de chacun et où les aspérités s’émoussent… Aujourd’hui, j’aimerais l’avoir gardé pour le présenter à nouveau , dans ce contexte.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I too have feelings and make statements that are not unreservedly positive… but I think if you asked my family or close friends they would call me a fan… and perhaps even the longer form of “fanatic”!
LikeLiked by 2 people
You are right. J’ai eu besoin de l’aide d’un couple d’origine anglaise pour finaliser la réservation pour UV (mon adresse mail posait problème). En ma présence, au téléphone avec le théâtre HP, la dame anglaise m’a présentée comme une vrai fan. (Elle voulait expliquer pourquoi je réservais plusieurs soirées). J’en suis restée interloquée.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Lol. Well I guess it’s hard yo understand if you haven’t experienced being a fan. Lucky you that you’re able to go to several performances!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am very lucky, sure. I hope that there will be no transit transport strikes…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Squirrel, maybe she was just asking out of curiosity…. I would think they are thrilled that you want to see the production a few times.. did you think her asking was too invasive for you? Or she thought of you as a fan and that wrinkled you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Non, ce couple me connait depuis des années. Nous nous apprécions beaucoup. J’ai rencontré toute la famille, y compris les grands parents. Je les ai suivis depuis la période où ils projetaient de s’installer dans le village. Ils sont venus me voir plusieurs fois pour recueillir des conseils. J’ai téléphoné à leur place pour débrouiller des situations complexes. Ils m’envoient leurs clients (anglais, hollandais, allemands…) Nous nous apprécions beaucoup,
Là, ils me rendaient la pareille. Mais devant l’étonnement de l’interlocuteur anglais qui s’interrogeait sur le nombre de soirées réservées par une étrangère, elle voulait juste justifier mon choix en me qualifiant de VRAI fan. Ce terme, répété plusieurs fois avec insistance par cette femme, m’a envoyé l’image exacte de ce que je rends.
Je pense leur faire un cadeau , pour ce service rendu bénévolement. Le monsieur m’a dit d’aller manger un “fish ans ships” mais pas d'”eel in jelly”…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ahhh ok. well I am tickled pink that you are going several nights and yes fish and chips indeed!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am tickled pink to find stew too!
LikeLike
Yes the stew!! You got the accommodations sorted then ?
LikeLike
No , because I have to wait to book the train. Airbnb for sure I have to choose…
LikeLike
I guess you wouldn’t consider giving her a Richard-related gift? Like a Pop Trevor? Lol… she might then be astonished herself! Maybe you can recruit her to the fandom? (All joking of course.)
LikeLike
Why not? But perhaps without plastic derived from petrochemicals. They are running a tourist camp and are living in a wooden chalet…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahh. Might have to find them a wooden carving then. They’d like the Oakenshield!
LikeLike
🙂 Goog idea!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember in the days of booking for The Crucible that there were some sort of half-open tussles with or regarding the box office — I don’t think Old Vic had really reckoned with the preoccupations with fans (and wasn’t entirely prepared to deal with them). Neither Old Vic nor Harold Pinter are places that run a lot of productions that attract high numbers of repeat visitors (like, say, musicals do).
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes — intense interest doesn’t also mean constant approval. I was intensely interested in Martin Luther for over 30 years. Definitely doesn’t mean I loved everything about him. But I would regularly have these conversations in social situations where people would ask me how that could possibly be — since in many ways he was such a distasteful individual. I would just say that I assumed that people who study genocide don’t do it because they love it (at least not most of it). The word “fascination” goes back to a Latin word for bewitchment, which certainly wasn’t always a positive experience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My interest in bog bodies proves it. No human sacrifices on my part at least not for now…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Whew.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. When I was younger, I used to read a lot of books about serial killers. As you say, not because I lived what they were doing, but because I found it fascinating to try to understand how their minds worked (or didn’t work).
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh that’s so interesting that you don’t have crush fantasies about him and instead “only his prowess as an actor led me to follow his career”! But I would not say “only”, as I think that is just as sufficient a reason as anything else and I would certainly call that being a fan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂 Servetus “think beyond “a devoted or interested follower of a person, thing, place, etc.” there are really too many boundaries to the definition of fan”.
No doubt, probably, there are as many definitions as the number of concerned human beeings whether they are fans or not.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Definitely YUCK Pete B!!!!
It’s just a picture. Who knows if they know each other, or were just seated next to each other. No biggie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is just a picture, but I find myself curious about other peoples’ lives in general, not just his. But really the main question I was thinking about was not what does the photo mean, but whether it would change my crush feelings if I knew for a certainty that he was gay. Which we don’t know and won’t know unless he decides that it is our business to know. Which is fine.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I think we should be happy with whoever makes him happy. He’s coming off a difficult year with the death of his mum and he’s been a work-a-holic for years. Even if this guy was just someone he was sitting next to or just met or whatever.
It’s just a picture. And there are pictures galore with me with female friend and male friends and that’s all we are. It bothers me that every time he’s photographed with anyone, people automatically assume he’s a couple. Just really uncalled for.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Zee thank you for saying that. I totally agree with you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well of course. I totally agree with you. I would only wish him the best and to be happy.
I’m only trying to explore for myself my fangirl heart. What is it that makes him a fantasy movie boyfriend for me? And what would any change in my perception of him do to the intensity of my crush.
LikeLiked by 3 people
You know, and this is the truth.
I can’t crush on a married celebrity, nor can I crush on a gay celebrity. I’m not homophobic, it’s just that I can’t.
But I CAN crush on a straight character!!! So there!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Like Guylty suggested!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup. I’m in love with Sir Guy, scoundrel that he is. Gary also has a spot in my heart. I think we could definitely understand each other – *nodnod*
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sir Guy and Thornton and Proctor are my top three. At least today. 😀
LikeLiked by 3 people
Sir Guy, Gary, and probably Harry for me. Harry’s a bit of a flirt! LOL!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Harry’s a sweetie pie! Cheeky too !
Love his glasses very sexy!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
And as I recall a while back, Richard said that women COULDN”T be in love with him because we didn’t know him – they were in love with Thornton. Considering how private he is – or tried to be – he’s right. We DON”T know him! We don’t know if he snores, or doesn’t like to wear deodorant or belches at the table, or scratches his crack… you get what I’m saying.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I kind of still like the man himself, though… what I know of him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, what we see and glean, he is a very likable and genuine person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sue I think your post brings up some wonderful and very valid points here. Again I take comfort that I’m not alone in these thoughts and it is so great to be able to chat openly here about how we feel and everyone contributes respectfully and graciously here. So I thank you again for pouring your thoughts out here and for me it isn’t really his single status per se.. it’s what happens to my physical attraction to him if the single status goes away in whatever form that will be. I know he’s a gifted actor, wonderful down to earth guy, bit naïve like me and ignorant but he’s human and I love that about him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think anyone’s mentioned that this is a rare genre of picture — in fact we typically already know who he is going to be pictured with in photos from Getty Images: usually either people he’s working / worked with or other celebrities. It’s also not a candid or a photo that makes its way to us sub rosa (like the pictures of him with Pace’s family in NZ). So the photo itself is anomalous in terms of our evidence basis so far: a photo of him with someone who isn’t a professional colleague but also isn’t a candid and/or stolen. I think that adds a wrinkle to it, particularly for anyone who wants to believe he’s gay and in a (committed) relationship.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, that’s true. (Although the photo I posted of them in the crowd listening to Neil Patrick Harris is candid, though at the same event with the Getty photos.) So yes, I think it’s a bit of a departure in that, whoever Gibb is to him, RA has full knowledge that these pictures will become part of the public record. So is he making a statement? Or is this just someone at the table or in a work connection that he thinks it is normal to be photographed with?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have always been too innocent for this kind of thing b/c I would have never jumped to that conclusion from those pics! I say that in a lighthearted manner, directed at myself, b/c I always seem to miss the clues when it comes to celebrities and their ‘on the down low’ love interests. supposing this man is romantically attached to Richard, my first reaction was ‘good for him, he’s got himself a hottie!’ 😀
I commend you on bringing this topic up though b/c it is something that I think we’ve all considered at one time or another but have only talked about behind closed doors, if we’ve even broached the topic out loud at all. I struggled with this idea during the whole Lee Pace speculation and I came to the conclusion that although I didn’t actually think Richard was gay, if it turned out that he was it would affect my fangirl feelings for him in a big way. I wouldn’t quit him completely b/c of it but it would change the enjoyment on an aesthetic level. I can find gay men attractive but I’m not attracted to them, if that makes sense? there isn’t something pulling me to them if I know that they’re gay. even if I’m not imagining myself with them, there is still that base pheromone thing. a lot of my celebrity crushes are happily married and I like that they are, so I’m not imagining myself with them but I’m still conscious of the fact that they are a man and I am a woman, there is still some semblance of a pull there b/c of that. so although I would love to see Richard in a romantic relationship, whether that is male or female, it will detach me from him on certain levels if it’s with a man.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I like this comment so much because of your remark about the photos — it increasingly bugs me that all relationships have to be classified in a box of sexual vs nonsexual, and then with the orientation pasted on top of that. Despite all the Pace discussion, there was never a photo of them together shared publicly where they looked anywhere near as friendly to each other as the guys in this photo do. Just speaking on the level of considering evidence, a photo alone, out of context means nothing except what the viewer wants it to mean.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I sometimes wonder what would happen if I were a celebrity. My friend at work and I, as I said, are usually close in pictures. We even went away overnight together once and didn’t tell anyone at work. Imagine the conclusions that could be erroneously drawn from photos from that trip!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed. When I was teaching philosophy last winter (which I might do again) it was a severe struggle to get students to realize that things could be true without the evidence for them being all that great, and also that there could be a lot of evidence for something without it ultimately being true, and that we have to think not only about evidence in itself but about why we see it in a particular way. (And this came up again in public history yesterday when we were talking about the tendency of museums on controversial topics to take refuge in facts and whether that’s a problem or not — the students being convinced that that is the way to go and their instructor being convinced that it’s insufficient as an approach).
In the end I think a lot of this comes from people’s desire for him to be happy (something I share; I also want him to be happy). If their version of happiness involves a committed relationship with the romantic partner of one’s choice (and they aren’t troubled by, or even celebrate, same sex attraction), then they will want to see this picture as evidence of that. That’s not a desire of mine, so I see a picture like this and shrug and my second reaction, after being annoyed about the platitude, is “he was at a charity event with some people he was comfortable with and looks really relaxed” and wonder how much he drank.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Working in a multicultural environment, this comes up all the time. Our experiences are so different and so we interpret things or people differently. As the old saying goes, to a hammer everything looks like a nail.
Yes, I would like him to be happy, as he is actually a real person and not just a construct for my own amusement. But it’s easier to keep the construct going if reality doesn’t rear it’s head. Lol. And isn’t that funny… I wondered the same thing and was checking out the empty glasses… didn’t notice any red wine residue. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Glasses of water. But he should practice because Astrov do like wine drinking thus.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes… I wonder if he is still not drinking? Or maybe just at public events.
LikeLike
No idea! He liked drinking a few years ago.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember, though, that when he recorded the Wolverine podcast, he said he had done some drinking the night before to roughen up his voice and that it had been the first time in a few years I think.
LikeLike
Lors de la réception à la sortie d’Hannibal , ils avaient bu un vin blanc de Bourgogne de grande qualité:
“Puligny-Montrachet ”
https://www.beaune-tourisme.fr/decouvrir/les-vins-de-bourgogne
http://www.degustateurs.pro/2015/11/comprendre-les-crus-de-montrachet.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice. I thought he was more of a red wine guy?
LikeLike
Good question! Maybe here and there 😉🤔
LikeLiked by 1 person
isn’t one of those a pro secco / aperitif glass?
LikeLike
I think so, but the glasses don’t look like they’ve had anything in them except the water glasses. Or maybe they drained them to the last drop! 🙂
LikeLike
Kelly thank you for saying all of this! My comment reply to you must have been sucked into thin air since I don’t see it but I concur with what you are saying. That pull in effect I think is spot on. But the positive things I have
gotten from the fandom are coming out of my shell and finding some wonderful friends that I have things in common with outside of Richarding 😘❤️👏
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is perfectly put, Kelly – “gay men are attractive, but I’m not attracted to them”. It kind of makes sense because it implies the lack of reciprocity.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Who knows what the photos mean, though. All the my show is two guys at a dinner together, leaning in because the photographer told them to. And yes he is pretty cute with his chiselled cheekbones.
I’ve thought about it during the Lee Pace speculation as well. But those pictures to me looked like friends and co-workers, but who knows. Lee May have been the reason Richard moved to New York. Or not.
“Base pheromone thong” is a good way to put it. There is something about the possibility of mutual attraction.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Even apart from that — I would argue that while many people feel it’s important for the crush to at least potentially be able to respond, it is not necessary (and arguably that’s particularly true in the case of the celebrity as they usually don’t even know we exist). I have always had a lot of fantasies about things that were never going to happen (and in fact, it was good that they weren’t going to happen!) and so the possibility that I could have a devastating crush on a gay actor isn’t all that bothersome for me. When I was 8 I had a fantasy that someday I could walk into the bakery in the small town near my grandparents’ house and order all the things and eat them all, too. I have sexual fantasies and/or turn-ons that I would never want to realize with a real person (and I suspect many others do, too). I am not troubled by that and I don’t understand why others should be, either (which gets to my next point). I know the difference between fantasy and reality and I suspect most people do.
My own suspicion (and this is a hypothesis, so I’m not saying it describes anyone’s actual reaction and everyone is free to fangirl as suits her best; everyone is going to draw the line on some things differently) is that the problem for some fans may really lie in the realm of the circumstance of unattainability. Fans, especially female fans, get made fun of because we develop crushes on people who we may never even meet apart from a screen or the pages of a magazine. That’s criticized as if it’s negative or even pathological — the implication is that women should abandon our fantasies and get on with real life. (I hear this so often, that someone’s in love with a star as a way of escaping having a real relationship, and I’m always annoyed. Why is an fantasy relationship inherently and automatically worse than *any* real one? It’s just not logical.) So if that’s a mechanism of shame, the subset of women who develop severe crushes on gay celebrities is an exacerbated version of it because not only can the celebrity not respond just for logistical reasons, he wouldn’t choose to, even if he could: “You’re infatuated with him, but if you met him he would think you’re ridiculous / disgusting because he isn’t even interested in women.” (There’s a similar version of shaming that goes on around physically unattractive fans that might be roughly equivalent: “you’re infatuated with him, but if you met him he would think you’re hideous / disgusting because you’re so ______ [fill in the negative adjective]”). For me: I personally don’t really want to internalize shame that comes from other people; I have enough of my own shame issues to deal with.
LikeLiked by 4 people
🙂
Pour en revenir au concept de boîtes, j’ajouterai qu’il explose dans la vie de tous les jours.
A l’heure actuelle, les codes vestimentaires et les codes comportementaux sont multiples, ceci au bénéfice du bien-être, de la liberté de chacun et du bon vivre ensemble.
Entre les personnes qui adoptent un style convenu (professionnel, religieux, ethnique, rétro, avant gardiste…) et ceux qui adoptent les styles ambivalents mélangeant les styles et les genres… toutes ces personnes se côtoient , se retrouvent à faire la queue chez le médecin par exemple…
Décider de sa propre relation à autrui, en la basant sur ces concepts de boîtes est une absurdité. “L’habit ne fait pas le moine” dit le dicton. S’arrêter aux apparences et aux clichés réduit gravement la qualité de vos relations à autrui, votre ouverture d’esprit à la diversité et par la même si vous êtes le médecin à la qualité de votre intervention.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Squirrel, all true. For me some that were jumping to conclusions that he is in a “long distance relationship” based off of a few pictures where he looks relaxed and happy is what got my goat. If he is happy with man or woman or both good for him. For now I will continue to dream he’s happy with me! hahahahahaha!!!! you have been vaccinated against this but I haven’t!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had to laugh because I saw “boîtes” and thought “that must be related to ‘boire’ ” and so I concluded it must mean “drinks” and then I was confused as heck. Yeah, looked it up, drinks is “boissons.” Seriously need a refresher course on my French!
I’ve actually started dressing all in black for class for this reason. Black shirt, black jeans, black shoes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂 You are always at the leading edge of knowledge on language studies. How to write box in French version? The word box has two spellings: with circumflex accent “boîte” or without circumflex accent “boite”. But what do they correspond to?
https://dictionnaire.orthodidacte.com/Article/orthographe-boite
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating: I knew about the relationship of the circumflex with the missing “s” — they taught us that in grad school in “Graduating Reading Knowledge of French” because a lot of times those words have some kind of cognate in English (even if it’s a “false friend), e.g., hôtel – hostel. I didn’t think about it in this case, though!
When I started blogging a lot of people thought I was somehow relating myself to Severus Snape. General cultural knowledge of Michel de Servet is low in the Anglophone world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Les études (basiques) en histoire sont autocentrées dans le pays où elles sont enseignées. Je n’ai pas l’honneur de connaître Michel de Servet. Sa mort est bien triste et cruelle.Il ne faisait pas bon de dévier de la pensée communément admise, dans ces temps là. Cela interroge sur les pratiques actuelles dans notre monde dit “moderne et civilisé”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are a lot of things that fascinated me about the historical Servetus, but the decisive one in picking the name is this: after he escaped from the Inquisition in 1553, instead of going somewhere obscure and disappearing, he went *straight* to Geneva. That’s the kind of thing I’d do.
LikeLiked by 1 person
– Locked up in a damp prison, sick and deprived of all help, Servetus wrote to his judges: “I beg you to please abstain from these great dilations. You see that Calvin for pleasure pleases me here in the prison lice eat me alive, my pants are torn and have nothing to change my doublet or shirt that a wicked. ”
– Thorin Oakenshield: “If this is to end in fire, then we will all burn together.”
– PROCTOR, laughs insanely, then: A fire, a fire is burning! I hear the boot of Lucifer, I see his filthy face! And it is my face, and yours, Danforth! For them that quail to bring men out of ignorance, as I have quailed, and as you quail now when you know in all your black hearts that this be fraud—God damns our kind especially, and we will burn, we will burn together! (III.596-601)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellently well observed. My self-association with so many of Armitage’s characters is anything other than arbitrary. You could add to this list Servetus the blogger’s dogged determination to try to keep her father at home as long as possible — even if he’s not cooperating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Daily self-sacrifice serving work, family, ….I do experience that too , part due to my catholic christian education. Damn it!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really think it’s a personality thing as well. Some of my students read “The Myth of Sisyphus” this week.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Albert Camus book?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Black is a beautiful color. May I call you: “Professor Servetus” or “Professor Severus Snape” or “Professor Minerva McGonagall” or “Mrs Keating”; they wore black clothes too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The idea that the crush might be able to respond has usually been important to me, but during the period when I was binge-watching “How I Met Your Mother”, I developed a little crush on Neil Patrick Harris knowing full well that he was gay. Especially after I saw him sing and dance. So I can understand the possibility of feeling that way (although I usually like to hold onto the possibility of reciprocity no matter how unrealistic). And I agree with you on the fantasies that one would never want to have happen in real life.
I actually think that, in many cases, crushes and fantasies fulfil some function that allows us to deal with real life as it actually is. So maybe we shouldn’t be made fun of but instead should be congratulated for finding something that helps us to have and accept those real experiences and real relationships!
I think in terms of unattainability, it’s easier to “convince” oneself that “if he only knew me he would feel the same about me” when the person is not gay. Even though in any case, understanding that this is a fantasy and not reality means that one must know that it 99.99% won’t happen. But that doesn’t mean we can’t have that crush and it doesn’t mean we should be shamed for it, regardless of who we are or who he is. (Not that I’ve experienced that shaming myself… just incredulity from people I’m close to that the crush is so enduring.)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ambiguity in the gender of the androgynous person intrigues and is often the cause of a renewed interest when I am confronted with it. I call it: (grand)motherhood fantasy protection.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Squirrel, that is intriguing. Do you find it is your curiosity about the gender preference so you want to know more or what specifically sparks your interest, if I may ask?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ma curiosité et mon amour pour les êtres humains en général et dans toutes leurs différences. “Radagast and Baroness Hale of Richmont spirit”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Squirrel you are a pure joy here and sweet and funny and I learn SO MUCH from you!! Merci!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Emphatically agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
“the crush is so enduring”, because of the quality, diversity of some blogs in this fandom, making room for amazing constructive dialogs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well that is certainly true!
LikeLike
I always say to people who tell me this, imagine a woman who always gets involved in real life with “bad boys” who abuse and exploit her. Is any fantasy really worse than that experience of reality? Even if for some reason the person in her fantasy abuses her, isn’t that a better alternative to a real life relationship in which she is abused?
I struggle with the question of whether an overlap with reality makes a fantasy easier or not. I’m not sure it’s true for me, or at least not in every case. It might relate to the intensity of the crush. For example, I have a horrible time with historical novels so often because what I know about reality makes them implausible. But that doesn’t seem to apply to my experience of having a crush in the least.
LikeLiked by 1 person
About reality and fiction:
As far as the fantasy of the fans is concerned, the fiction of some can appear to others as a reality. It’s a question of consciousness. Consciousness also has its biases. each person has his subjective opinions, his affects which can influence him. Does every fan have all his free will to make his choices, his decisions or his judgments knowingly, I doubt it. Especially if the reality is to be demonstrated by A + B, with irrefutable evidence
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the first chance I have had to read through all the comments properly as they are published overnight here and I have been out most of the day. Thank you for your post Sue, there is much food for thought here wrt my own fangirling experience. As one who went through the RA/LP saga, I’m still not sure exactly where I sit with all this. Many of the comments have something in them that I recognise within myself. The respect and thoughtfulness is a nice change from the feeling I used to get back in 2013-14, which was that of being beaten about the head by a very vocal group who were convinced Richard and Lee were in a relationship. I took the coward’s way out, and kept my head below the parapet!
I think Guylty’s onto something, crushing on the chaRActers. After all, we “know” them better than Richard in so many ways – their anger, their pain…..what they’re like when they’re asleep, making love.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Welcome and thanks for commenting. I’m happy that the post is generating so much discussion. It is nice to read and reflect on other peoples’ ideas and maybe learn from how they deal with their own feelings. Yes, Guylty may be on to something. And you’re right that we have seen them in all kinds of moods and activities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think most of those people are either no longer present in the fandom or else way backed off — but I know it was especially intense on tumblr. I also think that there was a subset of that group of fans who were heavily disappointed when their “support” for a potential relationship did not lead to them coming out as a couple and many seem to have fallen away. Well, Pace is out as “queer” now, anyway, in a way that seems to have resulted from a media maneuver, but it’s interesting how many of that group of fans have transferred their frustrations with RichLee and its failure to respond to their demands to Pace’s current lover (whom most of them despise with an energy that I rarely saw them attach to Armitage). So it may just be a sort of mode of being a fan that those people were living out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There were believers who left crying victim, even though they had been the loudest, while those on the other side of the fence seemed to just disappear quietly imho. They’d had enough. Never having been in a fandom in any way before, I was staggered by the vitriol – I was blacklisting left, right and centre. What I found interesting is that there were gay bloggers who asked the believers to stop fetishizing the men. It was all about the fans themselves, not RA and LP, something I think you might refer to in your last comment? So it may just be a sort of mode of being a fan that those people were living out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always thought that it wasn’t a problem if there were a semi-private or semi-public fetishizing going on — after all, in a way that is what fandom is / superfans do. I just thought that the belief that what they did mattered was so off track — i.e., that if they badgered everyone into sharing their beliefs about the ship, that would somehow have real world consequences — that it was sort of politically disturbing. I mean, if you want to support LGBT people in reality there are lots of ways to do it, but the idea that what you say about a celebrity couple on line makes a white of difference to those people’s real lives and struggles? Nah. I wrote a lot of posts about this at the time but they fell on deaf ears. And yeah; it was all about the fans (independently of what exactly Pace and Armitage’s relationship was about), and the significant number of trolls who were egging people on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whenever we talk about this topic I always think of this song:
LikeLiked by 2 people
Or even… https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tbU3zdAgiX8
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed — my parents love(d) that song.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really interesting blog and debate. To me Richard Armitage the person is as much a fantasy figure as his characters. For some reason, in this respect, his allure increased with the possibility that he might be gay. I loved the Pace period and felt bereft when it ended ( imagined relationship or not). I don’t think it is just the attraction of the unattainable. Squirrel’s comment ‘Ambiguity in the gender of the androgynous person intrigues’ is closer. RA’s elusiveness attracts me as a fantasy, as well as e.g. the disdain and contempt of his other characters.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you for your comment! I am flattered to have been able to express this remark correctly in the English language.
This feeling is not new. Thanks to my work, I have the opportunity to rub indifferently people of any kind, from any horizon. This allows me to question the best way to address them, every day.
As for my last sentence, I think the exact term could be “motherhood protection fantasy”…
LikeLiked by 2 people
You beautifully put into words what I was stumbling to say.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is exceptional. Most of the time, my words do ask questions about their meaning, I am sure.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You do quite well with your phrasing, whether in French or in English.
LikeLike
🙂 I started writing around January 2015, after Charlie Hebdo shooting. On Servetus blog, I quoted Hannah Arendt’s words reported on the radio… But I still need Reverso, linguee and google traduction help..
LikeLiked by 1 person
You do much better than I would do in French. I used to be pretty good and took French up to first year university and German during high school, but you really lose it if you don’t use it. My comprehension (in French at least) is better than my speaking/writing, but it’s pretty rusty.
LikeLike
Who knows? Try again, you will improve , I am sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I’m glad my musings sparked some good conversation. Yes, we only know a small slice of RA the person and from there we probably each create a different idea in our minds. I have to say that I wasn’t totally immune to the Pace speculation. I did enjoy reading “The Secret Diary of RA and LP”, however unrealistic because it was written by women and so was quite romantic. (Seems to have disappeared now.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that’s true — and add to it the fact that if he were gay, he couldn’t be interested in any fan romantically so it puts everyone back on an equal footing (so to speak).
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good point!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unless they were male!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Jane OOOOOOOOHHHHHH you went there!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes — although the number of men who are fans of his, feel some kind of attraction to him, and also talk about it is vanishingly small.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have seen many pictures of Richard with other men and women over the years and I never tend to jump to conclusions over them but when I saw these, for the first time ever I thought, “that’s his partner!” Something about the body language and the look, not just on Richard but also on Jim made me think that. I haven’t read all the reactions here but I’m with Armidreamer that I think Richard the person is a fantasy figure and we only get to see bits and pieces of him, never the whole picture. So any fantasy I might have is based on that. Also, my fantasies over who he is are more emotional than sexual anyhow. So, for me, no I don’t care one whit whether he’s gay or not, that will not affect my love for him. I just want him to be happy and he really looked happy in those pics. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well said!
LikeLiked by 2 people
He definitely looks happy, healthy and comfortable in these pictures, regardless of who Gibb is to him. It looks like he had a good evening out. I was thinking it was too bad he wasn’t photographed with any of the A-listers who were there and I was wondering whether it bothers him that he’s not in that group.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It wouldn’t bother me… being an A-lister invites in a lot of scrutiny, I wonder if he’d ever really want that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Possibly not, but I doubt he even gets to meet most of them, even being at the same event.
LikeLike
It could be good for getting better roles…
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. He may not be great at putting himself forward with the big names.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sue that’s really interesting too. Maybe he feels not quite intimidated by the A listers but shy?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not sure whether shy exactly, but he has said he has a hard time pushing himself forward and I think you have to be good at shmoozing and at selling yourself to get ahead in most businesses.
LikeLike
Yep I agree! I know I couldn’t do it which is why I hesitate doing the dating sites
My hopes are meeting a guy the old fashion way whatever that is now a days!! 😂😂😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Esther I agree with you about if he would want to be an A lister maybe he just needs to be social and network more. Certainly there was a wide range of talent at that function on Monday
night!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, my, I so enjoyed reading your fangirl approach to this finding. I felt like a kid again – I haven’t paid attention to any actors like that for a really long time. I agree with you on the suit, shirt, and tie – a very eye-appealing combination. I’m sure time will reveal the truth about your suspicions. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. It’s fun to have a distraction from real life! Especially such an attractive one!
LikeLike
You were right Shelley.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anne!! What a fun surprise to find you over here!! Happy New Year!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You too! I have been following Richard Armitage with his fans since 2013.
LikeLiked by 2 people
:-)!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Manifestos are dangerous | Me + Richard Armitage